Emil Ruusuvuori
To Win first set
Ilia Simakin
To Win first set
Emil Ruusuvuori
To win 2-0
Ilia Simakin
To win 2-0
Emil Ruusuvuori
To win 2-1
Ilia Simakin
To win 2-1
over 20
Games
Prediction of Emil Ruusuvuori [228th] vs Ilia Simakin [271st] Head-to-Head At The 2025 Gwangju Challenger (04-22-25)
By Wojtek Kolan - April 22, 2025
Ruusuvuori is scheduled to play Simakin on Tuesday at 06:35 AM CET, in the Gwangju Challenger, First round.
Form
L W L W L W W L L L
Form
W W L W W W W L W WRuusuvuori vs. Simakin Pick
Derived from the implied probability from the moneyline, Ruusuvuori has a 49.5% chance to get the victory.
TAKE NOTE: Join the Matchstat.com tennis predictions club to reveal implied and our accurate predictions to discover profitable bets so you can make successful bets.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Emil Ruusuvuori | 49.5 % |
| Ilia Simakin | 57.45 % |
|
Above is calculated from odds. Login now to find out our expert picks. |
Head-2-Head: Ruusuvuori 0 - 0 Simakin
| Ruusuvuori | Stats | Simakin |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (5-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 77% (20-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 228 | Ranking | 271 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 271 |
| 26 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 6 |
| 61% (284-184) | Career Total W/L | 67% (138-67) |
| $2,614,675 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
22 Apr 2025 / First
Ilia Simakin implied favourite from odds → 57.45%
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
Edge
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Ruusuvuori VS Simakin H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Current Event Stats
Gwangju Challenger
Hard| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1st Match | Total Matches | 2 |
| 1st Match | Last Match | 0:59:32 |
| 1st Match | Total Time | 2:19:23 |
| 1st Match | Aces Per Game | 0.94 |
| 1st Match | Aces Total | 17 |
| 1st Match | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1st Match | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1st Match | 1st Serve % | 66% (69/105) |
| 1st Match | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (54/69) |
| 1st Match | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (23/36) |
| 1st Match | Total Break Points Won % | 54% (7/13) |
| 1st Match | Total Break Points Saved | 86% (6/7) |
| 1st Match | Service Hold (%) | 94% (17/18) |
| 1st Match | Opponent Hold % | 61% (11/18) |
| 1st Match | Return Points Win % | 45% (51/113) |
| 1st Match | Total Points Won | 59% (128/218) |
| 1st Match | Tiebreak Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Match | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
| 1st Match | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st Match | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Ilia Simakin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ruusuvuori 0 - 0 Simakin
Editorial Prediction:
The upcoming tennis match between Ruusuvuori and Simakin promises to be intriguing based on recent statistical comparisons. Over the last six months, Simakin has demonstrated better second serve performance, winning 45.01% of points, compared to Ruusuvuori's 42.46%. This statistic is known for its high correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Examining return game effectiveness, Ruusuvuori holds a slight edge in returning second serves, capturing 49.62% of their opponent's points, while Simakin registers 44.08%. When it comes to first serve returns, the statistics are closer, with Ruusuvuori at 25.05% and Simakin at 24.22%, further contributing to the difficulty in picking a favorite for this head-to-head matchup.
Looking into pressure handling, Ruusuvuori excels by saving 66.04% of breakpoints compared to Simakin's 50%. This stat is particularly valuable for live in-game betting scenarios. Additionally, Ruusuvuori has converted 32.69% of breakpoint chances in recent form, closely trailing Simakin, who has a conversion rate of 33.69%.
In a broader performance overview from the last year, Simakin has a superior match win rate, securing victory in 76.4% of their matches as opposed to Ruusuvuori's 40.74%. Ruusuvuori's most successful surface historically has been indoor hard courts with a 68% win rate, while Simakin shows strength on hard courts with a 69% win rate.
When considering player level, Ruusuvuori has played several Challenger/ITF tournaments, winning 40% of those matches, while Simakin has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellite/ITF tournaments with a higher success rate of 79.31%. The level of competition also varies, with Ruusuvuori facing opponents averaging a rank of 165.63, significantly higher than Simakin's 394.9.
In the context of deciding set performances over the last year, Simakin edges out with a 56% success rate compared to Ruusuvuori's 50%. This could be pivotal should the match reach a deciding set. Historical performance at specific events and ongoing event form should be monitored for a more informed prediction.
Considering all statistical facets, Simakin's consistently higher win percentages, both in individual competencies and overall performance, suggest that they may be the favorite to win this match. However, Ruusuvuori's ability to handle pressure situations and slightly better competition level faced could pose an interesting challenge.
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Ilia Simakin Best Odds For The Match
To Win
Ruusuvuori
+102
Simakin
-135
To Win first set
Ruusuvuori
-113
Simakin
-105
To win 2-0
Ruusuvuori
+212
Simakin
-263
Games
> 20
-714
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Matisse Bobichon
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilia Simakin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Viktor Durasovic
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Ilia Simakin
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Zachary Svajda
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
54%
(
54 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Duckhee Lee
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Yi Zhou
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Ilia Simakin
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Matt Kuhar
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Billy Suarez
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ruusuvuori vs Simakin?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ruusuvuori Vs Simakin is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (120/65) | Win/Loss | 69% (127/57) |
| 61% (272/171) | Sets Win/Loss | 67% (278/138) |
| 54% (2261/1929) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (2212/1694) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
| 723 | Aces Total | 979 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 602 | Total Double Faults | 455 |
| 1:40:45 | Average Match Time | 1:30:45 |
| 342.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.3 |
| 65% (8300/12793) | 1st Serve % | 62% (7005/11246) |
| 71% (5889/8300) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (5122/7005) |
| 50% (2253/4493) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2189/4241) |
| 42% (561/1321) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (549/1296) |
| 41% (5322/13108) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4878/11775) |
| 67% (113/169) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (126/183) |
| 46% (6/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (39/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (29/53) |
| 56% (30/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 92% (112/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (127/118) |
| 8% (112/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (127/9) |
| 23% (73/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (57/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
